Jump to content

Same Sex Marriage Will Be Protected Law Soon


BarryLaverty

Recommended Posts

That is a state issue just like abortion, Thomas is right that it needs to be revisited. I remember when the Scotus struck down the DOMA and George Bush saying we just need a federal law not a constitutional amendment to protect marriage and that was when 80 percent of the states would have agreed. George Bush was wrong again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

Bet you 50 cents you have before. 

If you can find ONE post that I actually made where I actually advocated for that (or asked "why not?"), I'll admit I was wrong, which is something you seem incapable of.

But let me ask you, Barry: Why is 2 the "magic number" for marriage? Why not more? I mean, didn't David have eight, at the same time?

Edited by Monte1076
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, DB2point0 said:

It says who you love, no stipulation on if they’re married.  

That's what Schumer said, and that's my broader point. I mean, he did say "no matter who you love", right?

What if two siblings want to marry? Would that be allowed under this bill? What about cousins (although a surprisingly high number of states allow for cousin marriage, after a certain "level". First cousins I don't think can marry in most states, but second cousins can)? How about a nephew and an aunt, or an uncle and a niece, as long as they're both legal consenting adults?

What if someone could marry in such a way that they were their own step-grandfather?

 

Edited by Monte1076
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ObiOne said:

Imagine that.  He's a hit and runner.  He will post a link to some liberal garbage but he doesn't take the time to have an actual discussion. 

I don't dabble in nonsense, rabbit chasing, or general craziness, and I do recognize leading questions and general trolling, so that limits severely most interactions with you. It really hurts my heart not to be to have 'discussions' with you. 

  • LOL! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BarryLaverty said:

You don't understand the definition of marriage? Not surprising, but you can know that it doesn't involve a 'living doll', so that's out of the picture for you. 

You think you’re funny, but you’re not.  Typical liberal.  I know where the definition of marriage came from, just wondering if you did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BarryLaverty said:

I don't dabble in nonsense, rabbit chasing, or general craziness, and I do recognize leading questions and general trolling, so that limits severely most interactions with you. It really hurts my heart not to be to have 'discussions' with you. 

I call Horse poo….every one of your posts is full of those things.  

Edited by DB2point0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, country said:

Progressives applaud the program which has delivered 290,000 children and teenagers since January 2021, most of whom are work-ready teenage males.

https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2022/11/30/veritas-whistleblower-bidens-border-rules-fueling-child-prostitution-child-labor/

What does this have to do with the OP? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...