JohnnyFootball Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 4 hours ago, MavGrad99 said: You are still feeding the war efforts in WW2? Damn, really #### to be an Aggie Who said anything in the present tense? A&M DID put more officers into the war than the service academies combined. So I'd say that's a pretty big deal and worth the restrictions we dealt with in athletics.... Too bad we can't say "We won a lot of games while others had restrictions!!!" I guess.
JohnnyFootball Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 5 minutes ago, WETSU said: He’s saying that gender restrictions lead to many 18 year old male athletes not wanting to attend an all male school in a small college town. How many 18 year old players do you think would be influenced by something like mandatory Corps enrollment and no women allowed... I think MANY players would have gave that a hard pass. Which does in fact effect how good the team is when you practically handcuffed yourself into a much smaller talent pool... Not really sure why you think that’s funny or what you don’t understand about it. Common sense eludes tbird. Tbird makes db look smart sometimes.... And that's saying something. 1
Coach Rab Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 30 minutes ago, JohnnyFootball said: Who said anything in the present tense? A&M DID put more officers into the war than the service academies combined. So I'd say that's a pretty big deal and worth the restrictions we dealt with in athletics.... Too bad we can't say "We won a lot of games while others had restrictions!!!" I guess. If you look at what I quoted there is no tense implied other than the knowledge of WW2 being in the past. So if I was a 1st grader or a lost Brazilian tribesmen from the Amazon, I would think you are currently feeding those efforts.
HearEmaGrowlin Posted June 7, 2019 Author Posted June 7, 2019 FOOTBALL 1981 - 2011: UT is up 16-15. 1995 - 2011: UT is up 12-5. 2000 - 2011: UT is up 9-3.
Lhornfan Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 1 hour ago, JohnnyFootball said: Who said anything in the present tense? A&M DID put more officers into the war than the service academies combined. So I'd say that's a pretty big deal and worth the restrictions we dealt with in athletics.... Too bad we can't say "We won a lot of games while others had restrictions!!!" I guess. Much appreciated of Texas Aggies that served and led our young soldiers in battle. Numbers wise though, A&M was much larger in cadet enrollment than Westpoint and the Naval Academy combined already during WW2. It only makes sense that there were more Aggie officers. Again, much appreciated!
eagle34 Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 9 hours ago, HearEmaGrowlin said: FOOTBALL 1981 - 2011: UT is up 16-15. 1995 - 2011: UT is up 12-5. 2000 - 2011: UT is up 9-3. Did you forget the 70's? The Aggies had no gender restrictions that decade. They have conveniently omitted that to try and help their narrative. 1
TTman7 Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 11 hours ago, trueblue82 said: I agree. I’m somewhat surprised we haven’t seen more Clemson t-shirts than we have. I hear ya!!
Lobo97 Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 Yale is the most dominant football team of all time. Even Alabama hasn't caught up to them. 1
Mr. P Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 21 minutes ago, Lobo97 said: Yale is the most dominant football team of all time. Even Alabama hasn't caught up to them. He's right, you know...
JohnnyFootball Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 2 hours ago, eagle34 said: Did you forget the 70's? The Aggies had no gender restrictions that decade. They have conveniently omitted that to try and help their narrative. I don't think this makes the point you want it to make. Scholarship limitations started in 1973. And since 1975 it's 19-18 in favor of A&M. So yeah, you're only proving what's been said- that once the teams were on a level playing field, it's been relatively equal. BUT HEY THEM LAWNGHORNS BEAT THEM GAWD DANG AGGYS BACK IN THE DAY BOI I TELL YOU HWHAT!
JustAFan11 Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 55 minutes ago, JohnnyFootball said: I don't think this makes the point you want it to make. Scholarship limitations started in 1973. And since 1975 it's 19-18 in favor of A&M. So yeah, you're only proving what's been said- that once the teams were on a level playing field, it's been relatively equal. BUT HEY THEM LAWNGHORNS BEAT THEM GAWD DANG AGGYS BACK IN THE DAY BOI I TELL YOU HWHAT! The redneck impersonation missed the mark. You should’ve went hippy/Starbucks barista. 1
JohnnyFootball Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 8 minutes ago, JustAFan11 said: The redneck impersonation missed the mark. You should’ve went hippy/Starbucks barista. That would've been an even worse attempt. But an even bigger insult 1
JohnnyFootball Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 1 hour ago, TTman7 said: Take your SHSU education and get out of here.
Sportsfanatic1 Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 16 hours ago, JohnnyFootball said: Common sense eludes tbird. Tbird makes db look smart sometimes.... And that's saying something. Gotta admit^^Dude is on a roll. I've learned don't ever troll JF unless you are prepared for a better comeback. #truth
JohnnyFootball Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 8 minutes ago, Sportsfanatic1 said: Gotta admit^^Dude is on a roll. I've learned don't ever troll JF unless you are prepared for a better comeback. #truth
TTman7 Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 40 minutes ago, JohnnyFootball said: Take your SHSU education and get out of here. LOL ...I received EXACTLY the level of education I wanted at Sam. So your attempted dig at Sam doesn't sting me, lol. I couldn't have asked for a better degree education in my career field. When I was there, they were #1 in the nation in my degree field. And yes, I know, I said all that just to tell you "nope" I'm not going anywhere.
WETSU Posted June 7, 2019 Posted June 7, 2019 4 hours ago, JohnnyFootball said: I don't think this makes the point you want it to make. Scholarship limitations started in 1973. And since 1975 it's 19-18 in favor of A&M. So yeah, you're only proving what's been said- that once the teams were on a level playing field, it's been relatively equal. BUT HEY THEM LAWNGHORNS BEAT THEM GAWD DANG AGGYS BACK IN THE DAY BOI I TELL YOU HWHAT! Yea I was thinking that while reading it... The point is when all things are equal the rivalry has been much tighter head to head. Texas has excelled more against other opponents, but head to head has been close.
Sportsfanatic1 Posted June 8, 2019 Posted June 8, 2019 4 hours ago, JohnnyFootball said: The top hat fits
HearEmaGrowlin Posted June 8, 2019 Author Posted June 8, 2019 So, we’ve shown the head-to-head results. Now let’s look at overall results in the current era (since 2000). A&M Overall record is 139-100 15 bowl game appearances with a 6-9 record 0 BCS/NY6 bowl game appearances 1 double digit wins season at 11-2 with Johnny UT Overall record is 173-71 18 bowl game appearances with an 11-6 record 5 BCS/NY6 bowl game appearances 4 BCS/NY6 bowl game wins in 5 opportunities 2 National Championship Game Appearances 1 National Championship 2 Conference Championships 10 double digit wins seasons Aggie friends, please quit saying your recent history is equivalent to that of UT’s. These delusions are approaching the lunacy levels of the Democrats and their MSM buddies. 1 1
WETSU Posted June 8, 2019 Posted June 8, 2019 19 minutes ago, HearEmaGrowlin said: So, we’ve shown the head-to-head results. Now let’s look at overall results in the current era (since 2000). A&M Overall record is 139-100 15 bowl game appearances with a 6-9 record 0 BCS/NY6 bowl game appearances 1 double digit wins season at 11-2 with Johnny UT Overall record is 173-71 18 bowl game appearances with an 11-6 record 5 BCS/NY6 bowl game appearances 4 BCS/NY6 bowl game wins in 5 opportunities 2 National Championship Game Appearances 1 National Championship 2 Conference Championships 10 double digit wins seasons Aggie friends, please quit saying your recent history is equivalent to that of UT’s. These delusions are approaching the lunacy levels of the Democrats and their MSM buddies. Friend, learn to read. Every post on this thread that even remotely compares recent history, compares head to head against each other. I even pointed out that outside of head to head, Texas has done much more than A&M has. But why are we still wasting breath on this? Why don’t y’all start a thread comparing yourself to you “real” rivals. You know, the greatest rivalry in college sports that y’all like to brag about.
HearEmaGrowlin Posted June 8, 2019 Author Posted June 8, 2019 12 minutes ago, WETSU said: Friend, learn to read. Every post on this thread that even remotely compares recent history, compares head to head against each other. I even pointed out that outside of head to head, Texas has done much more than A&M has. But why are we still wasting breath on this? Why don’t y’all start a thread comparing yourself to you “real” rivals. You know, the greatest rivalry in college sports that y’all like to brag about. Yes Wet, I actually posted some head-to-head stats further up in this thread.
HearEmaGrowlin Posted June 8, 2019 Author Posted June 8, 2019 Wetsu, I just wanted to make the point, which you also just corroborated in your last post how much more success UT has had overall in football since 2000, what I guess we could call the current era in sports.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now