BarryLaverty Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 Guess who? https://www.yahoo.com/gma/donald-trump-indicted-second-time-233000986.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlahBlah Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 As Brittnay Spears once said; " Ooops I did it again ! " 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 Libtards would indict the Pope if they thought they could score political points ... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 I'm sure that dipstick Garland is on the brink of indicating Plugs and the Hilldabeast for the same crimes .... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlahBlah Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 Former Trump AG Barr says case very simple. Watch: Stunned Bill Barr Speechless After Fox Host Asks Why DOJ Is Pursuing Trump 'In the Middle' of an Election (thenewcivilrightsmovement.com) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youngcoach123 Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy We can’t have two tiers of justice: one for Trump, another for Biden. One for Assange, another for Manning. One for BLM/Antifa, another for peaceful protesters on Jan 6. I never thought we’d see the day when the U.S. President deputizes the DOJ to arrest his lead rival in the middle of an election. Obama shamefully tried to deputize the FBI to infiltrate Trump’s 2016 campaign, but they’re leaving nothing to chance this time around: the federal police state is outright arresting Trump. This is an affront to every citizen: we cannot devolve into a banana republic where the party in power uses police force to arrest its political opponents. It’s hypocritical for the DOJ to selectively prosecute Trump but not Biden. There are also serious legal questions about the President’s power to declassify documents and the potential illegality of the over-classification of federal documents in the first place. That’s for the courts to decide, but *we the people* decide who governs this nation. It would be much easier for me to win this election if Trump weren’t in the race, but I stand for principles over politics. I commit to pardon Trump promptly on January 20, 2025 and to restore the rule of law in our country. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarryLaverty Posted June 9, 2023 Author Share Posted June 9, 2023 4 minutes ago, Youngcoach123 said: s. I commit to pardon Trump promptly on January 20, 2025 and to restore the rule of law in our country. This line is hilarious, condemning while campaigning. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youngcoach123 Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 3 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said: This line is hilarious, condemning while campaigning. We can’t have two tiers of justice: one for Trump, another for Biden. One for Assange, another for Manning. One for BLM/Antifa, another for peaceful protesters on Jan 6. I never thought we’d see the day when the U.S. President deputizes the DOJ to arrest his lead rival in the middle of an election. This part was my favorite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youngcoach123 Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 And all wanted or had a disarmed populace 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 12 hours ago, BarryLaverty said: Guess who? https://www.yahoo.com/gma/donald-trump-indicted-second-time-233000986.html Again: indictments aren't convictions. He's afforded due process, is he not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 7 minutes ago, Monte1076 said: Again: indictments aren't convictions. He's afforded due process, is he not? According to them, an accusation or an indictment is the same as a conviction.....only liberals get due process..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBizzle Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 13 hours ago, BarryLaverty said: Guess who? https://www.yahoo.com/gma/donald-trump-indicted-second-time-233000986.html Perform your mental gymnastics real quick to differentiate between what was done by Trump versus what was done by Biden and explain how you indict one without the other. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyZuco Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 14 hours ago, BarryLaverty said: Guess who? https://www.yahoo.com/gma/donald-trump-indicted-second-time-233000986.html 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB2point0 Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 15 hours ago, BarryLaverty said: This line is hilarious, condemning while campaigning. Everything you post is hilariously dumb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB2point0 Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 He was also impeached twice, and got past those false charges. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 It's, uh, 37 counts now... https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23839690/read-trump-indictment-related-to-mishandling-of-classified-documents.pdf 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlahBlah Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 Trump has changed his name now to Anita Pardon 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HearEmaGrowlin Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarryLaverty Posted June 10, 2023 Author Share Posted June 10, 2023 (edited) Goodness gracious, this is just terrible stuff. (NY Times) NEWS ANALYSIS Indictment Presents Evidence Trump’s Actions Were More Blatant Than Known NEWS ANALYSIS Indictment Presents Evidence Trump’s Actions Were More Blatant Than Known The accounts in the 49-page indictment provide compelling evidence of a shocking indifference toward some of the country’s most sensitive secrets. By Alan Feuer and Maggie Haberman June 9, 2023 Updated 7:45 p.m. ET The indictment of former President Donald J. Trump that was unsealed on Friday provided compelling evidence that Mr. Trump’s handling of classified documents was more cavalier, and his efforts to obstruct the government’s attempts to retrieve them more blatant, than previously known. On nearly every one of its 49 pages, the indictment revealed yet another example of Mr. Trump’s indifference toward the country’s most sensitive secrets and of his persistent willfulness in having his aides and lawyers stymie government attempts to get the records back. Mr. Trump will have an opportunity in court to rebut the account presented by the special counsel Jack Smith. But the evidence cited refers to records casually kept in a bathroom and on a ballroom stage at Mar-a-Lago, his private club and residence in Florida. There was also a description of a knocked-over stack of boxes lying in a basement storage room, their contents, including a secret intelligence document, spilled on the floor. At one point, the indictment included an almost cartoonish image. Quoting notes from one of Mr. Trump’s own lawyers, it relates how the former president made a “plucking motion” as if to suggest that the lawyer should go through a folder full of classified materials and “if there’s anything really bad in there, like, you know, pluck it out.” A classic example of what is known as a “speaking indictment,” the charging document, which was filed on Thursday in Federal District Court in Miami, did far more than merely lay out seven crimes, among them obstruction of justice and the willful retention of national defense records. The indictment also showcased the bedrock elements of the former president’s personality: his sense of bombast and vengeance, his belief that everything he touches belongs to him and his admiration of people for their underhanded craftiness and gamesmanship with the authorities. It recounts, for instance, how Mr. Trump had only praise for an unnamed aide to Hillary Clinton who — at least in his narration of the story — helped Mrs. Clinton destroy tens of thousands of emails from a private server. “He did a great job,” the indictment quotes Mr. Trump as telling one of his lawyers. Why? Because, in Mr. Trump’s account, the aide ensured that Mrs. Clinton “didn’t get in any trouble.” The startling collection of covert material referred to in the indictment included documents about U.S. domestic nuclear programs, potential vulnerabilities to an attack on the homeland and plans for retaliatory strikes on foreign adversaries. In the bluntest language possible, the indictment explained just how dangerous this was. “The unauthorized disclosure of these classified documents could put at risk the national security of the United States, foreign relations, the safety of the United States military, and human sources and the continued viability of sensitive intelligence collections methods,” the indictment said. Though the strength of Mr. Smith’s case will ultimately be tested by Mr. Trump’s lawyers, the evidence that the special counsel and his team assembled was abundant and varied. The indictment included photographs, a transcript of a recording of Mr. Trump and, of course, the lawyer’s notes, which were obtained through a highly unusual legal tactic of working around attorney-client privilege. All of this taken together offered an intimate glimpse into Mr. Trump’s world at Mar-a-Lago, a domain where he apparently enforced a sense of personal control. In one anecdote in the indictment, two employees of Mar-a-Lago are described exchanging text messages about Mr. Trump asking Walt Nauta, one of his close aides, to move boxes of government records out of a business center at the property so that other workers could use it as an office. Mr. Nauta was charged with conspiring with Mr. Trump to obstruct justice in the case. “Ok,” the indictment quotes one of the employees writing to the other, “so potus specifically asked Walt for those boxes to be in the business center because they are his ‘papers.’” In a similar fashion, the indictment describes Mr. Trump as seeking to stonewall both the prosecutors who issued a subpoena to him for all of the classified material he had and the lawyer, M. Evan Corcoran, whom he had hired specifically to help him comply with that subpoena. “I don’t want anyone looking through my boxes, I really don’t,” it quotes Mr. Trump as telling Mr. Corcoran. “I don’t want you looking through my boxes.” The indictment did not merely accuse Mr. Trump of holding on to all these files. It also noted that on at least two occasions, he showed — or came close to showing — classified material to others who lacked the proper security clearances to view them. One of those episodes took place in August or September 2021 when Mr. Trump showed a representative of his political action committee the map of a certain country, commenting that a military operation there “was not going well,” the indictment said. It went on to describe how Mr. Trump quickly realized that he should not have been displaying the map and told the representative to “not get too close.” The indictment also related an account of a meeting in July 2021 when Mr. Trump brandished a “plan of attack” against Iran to visitors at his golf club in Bedminster, N.J. To the apparent discomfort of his aides — one of whom declared, “Now we have a problem” amid laughter — Mr. Trump admitted that he could have declassified the “highly confidential” document when he was president, but now it was too late because he was out of office. And yet, as the indictment described in painful detail, he almost seemed unable to control himself. “This is secret information,” it quoted him as saying. “Look, look at this.” Edited June 10, 2023 by BarryLaverty 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomer Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 On 6/8/2023 at 8:12 PM, Youngcoach123 said: We can’t have two tiers of justice: one for Trump, another for Biden. One for Assange, another for Manning. One for BLM/Antifa, another for peaceful protesters on Jan 6. I never thought we’d see the day when the U.S. President deputizes the DOJ to arrest his lead rival in the middle of an election. This part was my favorite. Amen, If Killary can flush 400k emails with government info and Slick Willie can nail the interns in the oval office then lie to Congress, U.S. citizens and media, old Trump will beat this dealio. If he don't he jus needs the libtard free pass status. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlahBlah Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlahBlah Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now