Jump to content

Judge reading jury instructions now...


Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, DaveTV1 said:

Trump isn't even close to their glorious honor of lese-majesty aka crimes against the King.  If I were Trump I would sell all of my holdings in New York and get out.  Those people are as corrupt as Gotham itself.  

Trump is going to be Trump, confuse his adversaries and invest more in New Yorkers and their businesses.

  • LOL! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PepeSilvia said:

IMG_5388.jpeg

I tried engaging you in some meaningful discussion but you didn’t respond. Again, do you not worry this could open Pandora’s box for all politicians? A precedent has been set now. The right could and probably will go after Democrats now. As I stated before, I hope Dubya Bush gets the chair for his crimes against Iraqis. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, SmokedOut said:

I tried engaging you in some meaningful discussion but you didn’t respond. Again, do you not worry this could open Pandora’s box for all politicians? A precedent has been set now. The right could and probably will go after Democrats now. As I stated before, I hope Dubya Bush gets the chair for his crimes against Iraqis. 

I hate to break it to you, but we're way, way past any meaningful discussions with these goons.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DAWG91 said:

I hate to break it to you, but we're way, way past any meaningful discussions with these goons.

I think I’m arriving at that conclusion. Outside of op ed pieces and very funny memes, I don’t think we are able to engage in some meaningful conversation. I rather enjoy a good healthy debate. Not claiming we have a brain trust on our side. That Lion fella dumbs us down a bit. Lol. He tries though. 

  • LOL! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Baron said:

Trump is going to be Trump, confuse his adversaries and invest more in New Yorkers and their businesses.

That would be the second worst decision of his life.  The first was running for President, because that has cost him billions.  I would almost say the third was helping to start the U.S.F.L., but that became a tax write off.  Had the U.S.F.L. succeeded he would have been worth a lot more.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

You did see the outcome of one of the trials he lost, right? 

If you're talking about the recent verdict, there's even a few Democrats and Progressives (see: Jimmy Dore, who is NOT Conservative or Republican by any means) who think the verdict was a railroad and absolutely political.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Monte1076 said:

If you're talking about the recent verdict, there's even a few Democrats and Progressives (see: Jimmy Dore, who is NOT Conservative or Republican by any means) who think the verdict was a railroad and absolutely political.

Whatever. You always have to have your bot 'whataboutism' to offer. Was actually talking about his fraud case where he owes hundreds of millions and can't do business in NY. I know they all blur and fluster his devotees after awhile. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BarryLaverty said:

Whatever. You always have to have your bot 'whataboutism' to offer. Was actually talking about his fraud case where he owes hundreds of millions and can't do business in NY. I know they all blur and fluster his devotees after awhile. 

You weren't specific on the fraud case. Were you?

And I love how you hide behind "whataboutism". It's clever.

And regarding that specific case, who exactly was harmed? The bank said they were happy with the transaction. They said Trump paid back the loan, and the bank got all their money. So where's the problem?

And if you were in that situation, would you do the same thing?

If you were going to borrow money against your house (say, via HELOC), would you tell the bank that your house was worth more than the county said it was? Would you expect the bank to double-check your numbers?

How about when you get a property tax assessment? Would you say that your house is worth what the county tells you, or would you try to get the valuation  reduced to pay less in taxes?

Try to be honest and provide an actual answer instead of dodging and deflecting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Monte1076 said:

You weren't specific on the fraud case. Were you?

And I love how you hide behind "whataboutism". It's clever.

And regarding that specific case, who exactly was harmed? The bank said they were happy with the transaction. They said Trump paid back the loan, and the bank got all their money. So where's the problem?

And if you were in that situation, would you do the same thing?

If you were going to borrow money against your house (say, via HELOC), would you tell the bank that your house was worth more than the county said it was? Would you expect the bank to double-check your numbers?

How about when you get a property tax assessment? Would you say that your house is worth what the county tells you, or would you try to get the valuation  reduced to pay less in taxes?

Try to be honest and provide an actual answer instead of dodging and deflecting.

Where were you when they needed your legal insight? He and his whole organization committed more than one kind of fraud, breaking laws. There is no way you can quibble that away. Why must you even try? 
 

https://apnews.com/article/trump-fraud-letitia-james-new-york-engoron-38bc3a7f2ccb22555c026e9bf70fd5bb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

Where were you when they needed your legal insight? He and his whole organization committed more than one kind of fraud, breaking laws. There is no way you can quibble that away. Why must you even try? 
 

https://apnews.com/article/trump-fraud-letitia-james-new-york-engoron-38bc3a7f2ccb22555c026e9bf70fd5bb

So you're dodging my questions. Again.

Not surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, BarryLaverty said:

You did see the outcome of one of the trials he lost, right? 

I used to think you were an intelligent libtard (oxymoron). Now I know better. This case had appeal written all over it when New York rewrote the law to cover the fact that the statute of limitations had expired.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Baron said:

I used to think you were an intelligent libtard (oxymoron). Now I know better. This case had appeal written all over it when New York rewrote the law to cover the fact that the statute of limitations had expired.  

I am now crying bitter tears over what a MAGA head thinks about MY intelligence! And, again, why didn't you offer your legal acumen when they so desperately needed it? :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leftist loons "he's guilty"

Us "of what crime?"

Leftist loons "of being a guilty convicted felon!"

This is where we are now.  There's nothing to work with here.  This insanity must be crushed without remorse.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DAWG91 said:

Leftist loons "he's guilty"

Us "of what crime?"

Leftist loons "of being a guilty convicted felon!"

This is where we are now.  There's nothing to work with here.  This insanity must be crushed without remorse.

They love their circular reasoning don't they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

I am now crying bitter tears over what a MAGA head thinks about MY intelligence! And, again, why didn't you offer your legal acumen when they so desperately needed it? :rofl:

And what makes you any sort of expert? Funny how people seem to only cite experts they agree with, ain't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Monte1076 said:

They love their circular reasoning don't they?

They've only made the impossible, possible.  The tiny sliver of fanatics who are cheering this travesty are about to get a very rude awakening.  DJT hauled in record amount of donations the first 24 hrs following this perversion of justice.  Normal folks get it.  Let the vile loony goons crow.

Edited by DAWG91
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/1/2024 at 2:04 PM, SmokedOut said:

I tried engaging you in some meaningful discussion but you didn’t respond. Again, do you not worry this could open Pandora’s box for all politicians? A precedent has been set now. The right could and probably will go after Democrats now. As I stated before, I hope Dubya Bush gets the chair for his crimes against Iraqis. 

You’re waisting your time with him and Barry. Both have really defended some deplorable things and are 99% wrong on everything they post. I sincerely believe it is shock factor because they can’t be that stupid in real life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...