YeahBuddy Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 46 minutes ago, PepeSilvia said: Why am I not surprised. Stay ignorant ma’am. To much evidence to dispute what you’re saying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PepeSilvia Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 24 minutes ago, SmokedOut said: Shouldn’t we make sure our homeless and impoverished citizens are taken care of before we start importing more? We could do both if the GOP would stop voting against bills intended to help impoverished citizens and vets. Also, the homeless with mental health issues would be in a much better situation if Reagan wouldn’t have drastically cut funding for mental health. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PepeSilvia Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 3 minutes ago, YeahBuddy said: To much evidence to dispute what you’re saying Provide it then or shut up. See I can act the same way lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmokedOut Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 1 minute ago, PepeSilvia said: We could do both if the GOP would stop voting against bills intended to help impoverished citizens and vets. Also, the homeless with mental health issues would be in a much better situation if Reagan wouldn’t have drastically cut funding for mental health. 35 trillion in the hole. Can’t do both. I choose our citizens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmokedOut Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 1 minute ago, PepeSilvia said: Provide it then or shut up. See I can act the same way lol. Chill out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YeahBuddy Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 6 hours ago, PepeSilvia said: Provide it then or shut up. See I can act the same way lol. Actually no…. I see the uncensored evidence and take it for what it is 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PepeSilvia Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 14 hours ago, SmokedOut said: Chill out Just responding how he was. Besides, when have I ever taken this site seriously Mr Flair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YeahBuddy Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 Just now, PepeSilvia said: Just responding how he was. Besides, when have I ever taken this site seriously Mr Flair. Apparently, you don’t take things seriously politically. Anybody that votes dem for that matter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PepeSilvia Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 Just now, YeahBuddy said: Apparently, you don’t take things seriously politically. Anybody that votes dem for that matter Aww man. That's a good one. Should be a nominee for post of the year. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAWG91 Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 35 minutes ago, PepeSilvia said: Aww man. That's a good one. Should be a nominee for post of the year. I hope it's a more legit process than how you nominate your candidates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlahBlah Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAWG91 Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 4 minutes ago, BlahBlah said: A real sophie's choice. Back home the country's run by a cannibal. I actually feel bad for these people that it's so 3rd world they resort to this type stuff. This ain't a color or race thing at all. Lots of documented cases of same type behavior engaged by folks of all creed and color, if the situation is desperate enough. Just such a mess everywhere you look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlahBlah Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YeahBuddy Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 5 hours ago, PepeSilvia said: Aww man. That's a good one. Should be a nominee for post of the year. Not really, just calling the spade a spade. Nothing too profound Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YeahBuddy Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 5 hours ago, DAWG91 said: I hope it's a more legit process than how you nominate your candidates. Lol!!!! That’s a 5gal bucket of fecal matter to the face!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PepeSilvia Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 8 hours ago, DAWG91 said: I hope it's a more legit process than how you nominate your candidates. You mean by voting for someone who’s on the ticket? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YeahBuddy Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 13 hours ago, PepeSilvia said: You mean by voting for someone who’s on the ticket? Only one party did that…. Not democrats 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAWG91 Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 13 hours ago, PepeSilvia said: You mean by voting for someone who’s on the ticket? It's not new really. Sort of a trend at this point . Let's consider the last 3 election cycles. In 2016 they circumvented the will of D voters by instituting the "super delegate." In 2020 Joe hid in the basement while the media campaigned for him. Now we get to 2024. The real nominee with the actual votes gets booted out just weeks before the convention to nominate a person without a single vote. That same person had to drop out of the race before their own state's primary in 2020 because they were gonna get trounced (2% D support.) Now, explain to me how any of that's "democratic." I'll wait. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PepeSilvia Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 1 hour ago, YeahBuddy said: Only one party did that…. Not democrats Dems voted for the person on the ticket. I don’t know what crack you’re smoking to think otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YeahBuddy Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 31 minutes ago, PepeSilvia said: Dems voted for the person on the ticket. I don’t know what crack you’re smoking to think otherwise. No they didn’t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PepeSilvia Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 2 minutes ago, YeahBuddy said: No they didn’t. Was she not on the ticket? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YeahBuddy Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 7 minutes ago, PepeSilvia said: Was she not on the ticket? He was the incumbent and the ticket in the primary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PepeSilvia Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 3 minutes ago, YeahBuddy said: He was the incumbent and the ticket in the primary. And she was on his ticket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyZuco Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 1 minute ago, PepeSilvia said: And she was on his ticket. While I agree she is on the ticket.....there was no real person running against the ticket......I mean the 2 people that they let run in the primary, do they even have a name? If RFK had been running, then maybe she is NOT the candidate....but we will never know, while she is the nominee, it looks very bad that she wasn't the "primary" of the ticket.....just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAWG91 Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 DJT was only person listed on GOP ballot. I didnt see the D ballot, but I doubt it listed both Joe and KH. This should be an easy matter to settle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now