max89 Posted July 8, 2006 Share Posted July 8, 2006 Who is better Ricky Williams of Earl Campbell and why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAD Posted July 9, 2006 Share Posted July 9, 2006 Earl, he was Tx when they played ND Earl was keyed on and they won with Ricky he wasn't only one to stop, UT was more versatile as team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lhornfan Posted July 9, 2006 Share Posted July 9, 2006 Who was Nebraska keyed on in the BIG XII Championship when James Brown play-actioned to the tight end? They are both great in their own day. Ricky was more of a threat in the open field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramsn03 Posted July 9, 2006 Share Posted July 9, 2006 Hard to compare, its a different kind of football now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EB75 Posted July 9, 2006 Share Posted July 9, 2006 I will take Earl on this one. It is tough, but Earl could run you over and go 80 yards for the score. He was a bruising runner who got better as the game progressed. And during an era where everyone ran 75% of the time, he still was the most dominating player in CFB. Ricky did things a little differently, but just as effectively. Ricky was more of a threat in the passing game, but they also threw it more in his offense than Earl's did. I would like to think that if they had switched eras, that both would still have been just as dominant. I have always thought that great players would be great players regardless of when they played. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footballfanatic06 Posted July 9, 2006 Share Posted July 9, 2006 How do you compare a pot smoking idiot who abandons his teammates and has a pretty average career to an all time legend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted July 9, 2006 Share Posted July 9, 2006 Originally posted by LhornfanRicky was more of a threat in the open field. I beg to differ. In his college and early NFL days, Earl had more speed than Ricky Williams. Earl could run with power and speed! :w00t: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max89 Posted July 9, 2006 Author Share Posted July 9, 2006 Im talking about college football... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lobo4life Posted July 9, 2006 Share Posted July 9, 2006 I've only heard stories about Earl. I was able to watch Ricky. Collegiately, I think Ricky was pretty darn good. He basically set the all-time rushing mark in 2 years as he was the FB or 2nd RB the first 2 years he was on campus. Just imagine how many yards he would have finished his career with had he been the featured back his entire career. That said, I can't choose either one because I was never able to watch Earl play. I'll have to rely on the older and wiser posters on this one as they were able to see both of them in action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottieCH Posted July 9, 2006 Share Posted July 9, 2006 lol well he probably didn't just magically become and idiot and a pot smoker the minute he entered the NFL those high values were more than likely already there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EB75 Posted July 9, 2006 Share Posted July 9, 2006 Originally posted by footballfanatic06How do you compare a pot smoking idiot who abandons his teammates and has a pretty average career to an all time legend? This is a comparison of their on-field comparisons in college, not what they did off of the field, or even after college. Post college, Earl is obviously the better player and role model. But the post was about their college careers. Nobody can argue what these two great UT players accomplished on the field, and that is what we are talking about. Again, Earl over Ricky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LP 78 Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 Earl! Not close in my mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steers4State Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 Earl he doesnt do illegal substances.. Lets just leave it at that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footballfanatic06 Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 Originally posted by EB75 Originally posted by footballfanatic06How do you compare a pot smoking idiot who abandons his teammates and has a pretty average career to an all time legend? This is a comparison of their on-field comparisons in college, not what they did off of the field, or even after college. Post college, Earl is obviously the better player and role model. But the post was about their college careers. Nobody can argue what these two great UT players accomplished on the field, and that is what we are talking about. Again, Earl over Ricky. My bad, It didn't state that this was collegiate careers. In that case it's hard to argue with william's numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierDaddy Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 Originally posted by footballfanatic06How do you compare a pot smoking idiot who abandons his teammates and has a pretty average career to an all time legend? Think what RW could have done if he had been clean! I think EC was more dominant in his era than RW was in his, but i think the game was alot different. He is an idiot, but i'd take RW if we are talking straight up talent. If we are talking hot links.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoaky Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 I have seen them both, and although Ricky was very good...Earl was so special. He also shared some carries throughout his career, and basically missed his sophomore season with an injury. It's difficult to compare different era's, but it would be awfully tough for anyone to beat Earl at running back. The good news for UT is they've had a bunch of good one's, dating back to even Chris Gilbert, Steve Worster, Roosevelt Leaks through Williams, Benson, and now Jamal Charles. Earl Campbell is perhaps the greatest player in UT history, along with Vince Young and to include a defensive player, Tommy Nobis. Smoaky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierDaddy Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 Really close, one cooks hotlinks, the other hash! tough call! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GabeHorns Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 Ricky Williams is arguably the best college RB in history. He had a mediocre team and was still able to put up those yards, and he even played mostly FB his freshman year. I didn't see Early play, but statistically, Ricky is the better RB. You can't rank a player based on what they do after college... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottieCH Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 statistics aren't always accurate i mean look at Peyton Manning and Tom brady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 The Tyler Rose any day of the week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GabeHorns Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 Well there's a difference between a guy rushing 6,000+ for his career and having 15 NCAA records for single season and career held by the likes of Hershal Walker, Barry Sanders, Archie Griffin, Marcus Allan... Earl was a great RB, no doubt, but Ricky proved he was the better college RB.... stats don't lie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 I'd take Earl Campbell over Ricky Williams as a college back any day of the week! Campbell was bigger, stronger, and yes, FASTER! :w00t: You can't compare statistics equally from two different decades almost 30 years apart. Earl Campbell was a War Horse! :w00t: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bordertown Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 Smoaky is correct in saying Earl shared the load. He ran in the wishbone which featured four running backs and 7 blockers. Earl was a strong runner. He probably possessed the greatest stiff arm in football history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxBroadcaster Posted July 11, 2006 Share Posted July 11, 2006 First off as said before it is hard to compare players from different generations. Cambell spent his first three years sharing the load in the whishbone...BUT Ricky Williams in my opinion faced better Athletes on defense. faster LBs stronger DL and bigger Safetys IMO. Williams also spent time at FB before being moved to TB. Yes Williams had more carries, but he also had a better average (6.2 to 5.8) and better yards per game (138 to 111.1) Williams also did this in an era when QB's threw the ball more. Some say that will help becauase it takes the pressure off of him, while others say it hurts because it takes carries away from him. To me it is a wash. About who was faster..no real way to tell unless some reliable forty times were provided. Size wise, they are not that diff. Cambell came in to college bigger but lost weight down to 220 his SR year..about where Williams was his SR year. I think to many people are looking at what Williams has done after college and making a decision. Also does not help that your asking on a board that is in East Tx, where Cambell is from, while Williams is not even from Texas. IMO these two are hard to seperate. They ran the same way, same body size and comparable speed. Neither one was better than the other by a mile or anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted July 11, 2006 Share Posted July 11, 2006 I remember someone telling me Earl Campbell ran 9.6 in the 100 yard dash in high school. Not being from Tyler, I don't know if that's true, but I don't think Ricky Williams was anywhere near that fast! Campbell played a lot bigger than Williams in my opinion and was much stronger. I also think Ricky had much better offensive linemen to run behind than Earl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now