THE FACTS ON POVERTY IN THE U.S.

[MilitantModerate1966]

Last month, to much media pooplah, the Census Bureau released its annual report on poverty in the U.S. Predictably, liberals all but wailed about bread lines and soup kitchens. Democratic Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut called the poverty figures "a national scandal." But the report contained relatively good news, as recessions go.

 

As expected, the Census numbers showed poverty had increased in 2002 due to the economic downturn; however, the poverty rise was quite modest when compared to prior recessions. For example, the report showed that during the first two years of the current downturn the number of poor children increased by 550,000 or one half of 1% of all children. By contrast, in each of the previous three recessions (back to the early 1970s) child poverty increased, on average, by two and a half percentage points over the same period—or five times as much. In its impact on poverty, the economic slowdown from which we are now emerging was one of the mildest on record.

 

But what is more remarkable is the story behind the Census figures: The actual living conditions of the individuals the government deems to be poor. For most Americans the word "poverty" suggests destitution: an inability to provide a family with nutritious food, clothing and reasonable shelter. But only a small number of the 35 million persons classified as "poor" by the Census Bureau fit that description.

 

While real material hardship certainly does occur, it is limited in scope and severity. The bulk of the "poor" live in material conditions that would have been judged as comfortable or well-off just a few generations ago. Today, the expenditures per person of the lowest income one-fifth (or quintile) of households equal those of the median American household in the early 1970s, after adjusting for inflation.

 

Microwaves and Stereos

 

The following are facts about persons defined as "poor" by the Census Bureau, taken from various government reports:

 

Forty-six per cent of all poor households actually own their own homes. The average home owned by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three-bedroom house with one and a half baths, a garage and porch or patio.

 

Seventy-six per cent of poor households have air conditioning. By contrast, 30 years ago only 36% of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.

 

Only 6% of poor households are overcrowded. More than two thirds have more than two rooms per person.

 

The average poor American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris, London, Vienna, Athens and other cities throughout Europe. (Note: These comparisons are to the average citizens in foreign countries not to those classified as poor.)

 

Nearly three-quarters of poor households own a car; 30% own two or more cars.

 

Ninety-seven percent of poor households have a color television. Over half own two or more color televisions. Seventy-eight percent have a VCR or DVD player. Sixty-two percent have cable or satellite TV reception.

 

Seventy-three percent own microwave ovens; more than half have a stereo, and a third have an automatic dishwasher.

 

As a group the poor are far from being chronically undernourished. The average consumption of protein, vitamins and minerals is virtually the same for poor and middle-class children, and in most cases is well above recommended norms. Poor children actually consume more meat than do higher-income children and have average protein intakes 100% above recommended levels. Most poor children today are in fact super-nourished, on average growing up to be one inch taller and ten pounds heavier than the GIs who stormed the beaches of Normandy in World War II.

 

While the poor are generally well nourished, some poor families do experience hunger, meaning a temporary discomfort due to food shortages. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, 13% of poor families and 2.6% of poor children experience hunger at some point during the year. In most cases their hunger is short-term. Overall, 84% of the poor report their families have "enough" food to eat, while only 3% say they "often" do not have enough to eat.

 

Overall, the typical American, defined as poor by the government, has a car, air conditioning, a refrigerator, stove, clothes washer and dryer and a microwave. He has two color televisions, cable or satellite TV reception, a VCR or DVD player and a stereo. He is able to obtain medical care. His home is in good repair and is not over-crowded.

 

By his own report, his family is not hungry and in the last year he had sufficient funds to meet his family’s essential needs. While this individual’s life is not opulent, it is equally far from the popular images of dire poverty conveyed by the press, liberal activists and politicians.

 

Still, "poverty", even as defined by the broad standards of the Census Bureau, can be reduced further, particularly among children. There are two main reasons American children are poor: Their parents don’t work much, and fathers are absent from the home. In good economic times or bad, the typical poor family with children is supported by only 800 hours of work during a year—that amounts to 16 hours of work per week. If work in each family were raised to 2,000 hours per year—the equivalent of one adult working 40 hours per week through the year—nearly 75% of poor children would be lifted out of official poverty.

 

Not having a dad around is another reliable pathway down into poverty. Nearly two-thirds of poor children reside in single-parent homes. Each year an additional 1.3 million children are born out-of-wedlock. If poor mothers married the fathers of their children, almost three quarters would immediately be lifted out of poverty.

 

While work and marriage are steady ladders out of poverty, the welfare system perversely remains hostile to both. Major programs such as Food Stamps, public housing, and Medicaid continue to reward idleness and penalize marriage. If welfare could be turned around to encourage work and marriage, remaining poverty would drop quickly.

 

Still, in a sense, the poor will always be with us. The liberal grievance industry needs an abundant supply of apparent victims to keep its motors running. Without a permanent victim class, liberals cannot survive. Thus, in liberal imagination and rhetoric, the microwave must always be bare.

[ParanoidAndroid]

If only it really were that good for all of us...

[junglejim]

"Ninety-seven percent of poor households have a color television."

 

 

Is it possible to get a B&W television now?

[ParanoidAndroid]

Anytime you have to add the word "color" to television, or mention owning a microwave (that anyone could get for $30 at Wal-Mart, or find for free in any city's classified ads) to try to make your argument stronger, you don't have one. I mean, seriously, we don't live in Ethiopia -- of course we can afford TV's or microwaves. I'm surprised this article didn't mention the percentage of the poor who have running water or electricty. ("Aha! They have a faucet! See, they aren't poor -- they're simply draining our welfare system! They're nothing but a bunch of tapwater-drinking economic parasites!")

 

A better question is how many of these people can afford to retire in their lifetime? How many of them could afford medical bills if they became seriously ill, since we know that they don't have health insurance? How many could put their kids through college without the help of financial aid? It's easy to judge people who file under a lower tax bracket when you've never been there.

[Aggie2008]

Forty-six per cent of all poor households actually own their own homes. The average home owned by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three-bedroom house with one and a half baths, a garage and porch or patio.

 

Seventy-six per cent of poor households have air conditioning. By contrast, 30 years ago only 36% of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.

 

Those statistics are somewhat misleading. While we certainly have the 'richest' poor people in the world, it is a farce to say that the majority of those living in poverty in America are living comfortably and wasting taxpayer money.

 

Having worked with 'poor' people the previous summer in the inner city of Detroit, I'll let you in on what the life is really like. Yes, quite a few of them own their own homes. In the neighborhood I was mostly working in, there was not a single house that was under 70 years old. Every single one of the houses I was at had been purchased two-three generations ago through government grants in the New Deal era and were passed down through family. Most of the houses we were repairing were built in the 20's-30's and were roach infested, termite ridden, and falling apart. Y

 

es, the statistics show that these people are 'homeowners'...but of houses that are falling apart and valued at 10-30k in a GOOD housing market. As for the 'garage' and 'porch'...if you can find me a house built in that time period (or even modern times) without a porch I would be suprised. Probably where they got the so-called 'garage' information was from outdoor sheds or storage units. While some have carports, I personally never saw a house with an attached garage during my summer there.

 

Most of the houses I've worked on also have air conditioning, but they are those window-based fans that are relatively inexpensive and because of insulation problems they don't work very well.

 

It amazes me how often people will come up with excuse after excuse simply not to help people in need or to rationalize their guilt of not being more helpful.