Jump to content

villagegenius

Members
  • Posts

    556
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by villagegenius

  1. This is part 2 of 4 of a really good non-district slate for Daingerfield. I’m sure people ain’t exactly lining up to play them their size, but knowing that you are going to be inexperienced up front and at QB and still having this schedule is pretty legit. No matter happens over the next 3 weeks I’d think Daingerfield , assuming they are healthy, comes out of this stretch ready to make a run. 
     

    Same goes for Tatum. I know West Rusk and Daingerfield are smaller schools, but talent wise they’ve both been really good to go along with the bigger schools of Center, Pitt and Lumberton. Good scheduling by both coaches IMO to get their teams ready for legit playoff football. 
     

    As for this game, once about every 4 pages someone makes the legit point that it’s going to come down to some interesting matchups. Tatum has the top 2 Lineman kids. Daingerfield probably has the top 2-3 skill kids. Is there a big enough discrepancy at either advantage to really take over the game? 
     

    QB for Tatum is definitely what makes them go. He not only makes them right a lot, but he ain’t no slouch toting it or throwing it either. Can DF scheme it up well enough to let the Soph have some easy throws? Soph also looked like he ran the ball efficiently against GW, so that’s an added element that wasn’t necessarily there for DF last year. 
     

    I know I said a lot, but all in all I think this is a really intriguing matchup that I’m sure both sides fans will judge calmly and with a sound, open mind 😂

    • Like 4
  2. My uneducated opinion after Week 1.

    1 Tatum

    2 Gladewater

    3 Jefferson

    4 Sabine

    5 Atlanta

    6 White Oak

     

    I really think 3-5 are all pretty close and will be good ball games.
    As long as Watson is healthy I don’t know if anyone beats Tatum in district. He keeps them out of bad plays and is a home run threat at the same time. Very dangerous. 

    I think Gladewater can give Tatum a good game, and their talent on the backend can keep the big play from happening…but death by 4-8 yards is still death in the end. Their offense matches up to Tatums strength on defense. 
     

    Jefferson we won’t know about until Week 6 or 7, unless they’ve lost a couple by then and we’ll know plenty. Interesting that they are playing down by level all pre-season. 
     

    Sabine is gonna go as the QB goes. He shouldn’t regress but only get better. Gonna have to be electric to knock off either of the top 2, but has the potential to be in the game with everyone else.

    Atlanta is better, and will be firmly in the mix. Will they have enough offense to knock someone off?

     

    White oak? Yea…

  3. Just now, CasualObserver70 said:

    Gilmer had a lot of skill position players out, but biggest concern has to be offensive and Defensive line. They don’t look that big, and the Oline was manhandled tonight. 
     

    never should read too much from a scrimmage. That being said, line play looks like a concern. 

    This makes 2 weeks in a row that Gilmer hasn’t looked like Gilmer. Just my plain Jane opinion. Of course you can’t take my opinion and a dollar and get you 1/4 tank of gas these days. 

  4. 1 minute ago, Nick2011 said:

    West Rusk vs White Oak Scrimmage Results: 

    Controlled:

    WR- 6 TDs 

    WO- 1 TD 

    Live Quarter 

    WR- 20

    WO- 14

    White Oaks QB had on a red jersey so our defense could not hit him. That prevented multiple sacks. 
     

    Seems like WR is playing some good ball to start it off

  5. 1 hour ago, Nick2011 said:

    The guy who said it usually doesn’t make stuff up 👀

    I didn’t specify which blue tigers 😅

     

    In all seriousness, they did say Grand Saline had their way on offense against Clarksville. Couldn’t do anything offensively against Daingerfield. 
     

    They thought GS looked like they were already better than last year and thought they’d have a good shot at making playoffs. On DF they said every time they looked up it they felt like DF was exploding for a big play. 

     

    • Thanks 1
  6. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. Tatum about to be extremely tough to beat. Not that the coaching staff won’t take the runs busting for long TDs, but they’ll be perfectly content to pound away behind Welch and Fite and shorten the game. You had better find a way to get ahead and make them play catch-up. 
     

    And I don’t say this as a Tatum fan or as someone expecting them to win state. Just simply saying that as someone who’s seen that offense work. They’ll be in almost every game unless they are completely outmanned, or turn it over a bunch. For no other fact than they will rarely have 3 and outs and that means a short offensive possession might be 4 minutes!

  7. 1 hour ago, centex1 said:

    not to get too technical but Waskom won state in 2015 and since then they only missed the play offs once

    2016 4-7 lost to Newton in the first round 

    2017 9-5 lost to Newton in the regional final

    2018 10-2 lost to Troup in round 2

    2019 5-5 3 way tied for 3rd in district lost on the tie breaker to EF and Diana

    2020 12-2 lost in semi finals to Franklin

    2021 13-2 lost in semi finals to Franklin

    Ah you are correct. Just saw the 4 and assumed they didn’t make the playoffs. That’s what happens when you assume. 
     

    just for the record, Waskom under keeling was quite impressive. My comment was simply directed at DTH saying Waskom doesn’t rebuild, they always reload. Just my personal thoughts but 4-7 after a state title is a rebuild year, and 5-5 after a 10 win year is a rebuild. 
     

    But again, that is not me knocking Waskom. There are only a handful of schools in East Texas who wouldn’t want to trade 2013-2021 run that Waskom went on. 

  8. 12 minutes ago, DTH4life said:

    And that’s me Waskom

    is going be a team no body talk about for years Waskom always reload no rebuild

    You might want to reconsider the last statement.

    16-0 to 4-7 the next year.

    10-2 to 5-5 the next year. 
     

    Twice since the last state title in 2016 you’ve finished out of the playoffs. 

  9. 13 hours ago, upullinmychain said:

    Don't overreach...,we brought back 9/10  from a classification higher,before dropping down.some of us can run and throw,just like big boy football...watch and let's see how it unfolds..might be interesting to see..if I'm not mistook,most of our predistrict games are against a full classification above us 🤷‍♂️

    And 2 of the 3 times Alto and Carlisle played the previous 2 realignments, Carlisle won correct?

×
×
  • Create New...