cheapshot11b Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 here's a link to dave cambell's 7on7 info: http://www.texasfootball.com/index.php?s=&...article_id=1846 on 2nd glance, maybe there is some connection. pretty good teams listed: 7 ON 7 STATE CHAMPIONS 1998: Southlake Carroll (4A) 1999: North Mesquite (5A) 2000: Celina (2A) 2001: Baytown Lee (5A) 2002: Katy Cinco Ranch (5A) 2003: Odessa Permian (5A) 2004: Tyler Lee (5A) 2005: Baytown Lee (5A) 2006: Colleyville Heritage (5A) 2007: Division I: Georgetown (5A) Division II: Celina (3A) CHAMPIONSHIP GAME SCORES (7ON7) 1998 – Southlake Carroll 47, Grapevine 33 1999 – North Mesquite 31, Lake Worth 27 2000 Championship: Celina 45, Abilene Cooper, 41 Consolation: Corsicana 50, Cypress Falls 42 2001 Championship: Baytown Lee 34, Austin Bowie 32 Consolation: Abilene Cooper 34, Carrollton Creekview 32 2002 Championship: Katy Cinco Ranch 42, Abilene 36 Consolation: Katy 41, Lufkin 34 2003 Championship: Odessa Permian 41, Burnet 27 Consolation: Southlake Carroll 54, Katy 40 2004 Championship: Tyler Lee 40, Katy Taylor 26 Consolation: Colleyville Heritage 32, Alief Taylor 26 2005 Championship: Baytown Lee 51, Bay City 34 *Third Place: Colleyville Heritage 27, Abilene 26 * Due to heavy rain in 2005, the consolation bracket was cancelled. The consolation championship game was replaced with a third-place game 2006 Championship: Colleyville Heritage 58, Rockwall 42 Consolation: Katy Taylor 26, Katy 12 2007 Division I Championship: Georgetown 41, Houston Stratford 24 Division I Consolation: San Benito 41, McAllen Rowe 34 Division II Championship: Celina 28 , Crane 21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cesarsoccer Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 Impressive correlation between 7v7 success in the summer and 11v11 success in the fall! 10 years and running... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheapshot11b Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 Impressive correlation between 7v7 success in the summer and 11v11 success in the fall! 10 years and running... i think they are all 7on7...sorry if it was misleading. The bottom is just the scores. the point still goes-good teamswin on any level...SLC, celina, tyler lee, katy, OP, lufkin....all state contenders year in year out. The link between 7on7 and 11on11 is stronger than what I 1st thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew328 Posted June 6, 2008 Share Posted June 6, 2008 There is a strong indicator that if you are good at 7 on 7 you are good in the fall. Bottom line is if you have good football players you'll do well in both formats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mav01 Posted June 9, 2008 Share Posted June 9, 2008 There is a strong indicator that if you are good at 7 on 7 you are good in the fall. Bottom line is if you have good football players you'll do well in both formats I think you can tell a little more about pass oriented teams in 7 on 7 than any others. If you're a pass happy team in the fall, then you should be expected to compete better in 7 on 7. Marshall is a balanced running team, that likes to pass enough to keep teams honest against the run. Maybe about 65% run to 35% pass(depending on what that particular defense gives). Marshall has lost to plenty of teams over the past few years in 7 on 7 that they probably would have smoked when the pads came on. See 2005; State Runner-up in the fall, but couldn't have beaten Texas School for the blind in 7 on 7 that year. That said, its still good work for running based teams for when they do have to pass or defend against the pass come fall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panther123 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 I agree... Means nothing until the pads are on. But SH still looked good during this tourney. your right they did, except for that nathan griffin kid, he's trash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101% Posted June 29, 2008 Share Posted June 29, 2008 SS seems to be dominating 7 on 7. Rockwall, R L Turner and Newman Forrest are the latest victims this weekend. The wildcats are somewhere around 24-1 and have made it look easy, IMO. Beating 5 a and 4 a teams, some with so called "high powered Os". State 7 on 7 will tell the tell but no one is giving them much notice. No top 25 ranking? A district champ that will return 85% of the whole team and a true high powered O. Did I mention that the linemen are also going to state in a lineman challenge. Could everyone be over looking them a little. YOUR THOUGHTS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew328 Posted June 29, 2008 Share Posted June 29, 2008 SS looked strong today at Rockwall, they beat two pretty good teams in Naaman and Rockwall. Rollison is progressing nicely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GloryBound Posted June 29, 2008 Share Posted June 29, 2008 SS seems to be dominating 7 on 7. Rockwall, R L Turner and Newman Forrest are the latest victims this weekend. The wildcats are somewhere around 24-1 and have made it look easy, IMO. Beating 5 a and 4 a teams, some with so called "high powered Os". State 7 on 7 will tell the tell but no one is giving them much notice. No top 25 ranking? A district champ that will return 85% of the whole team and a true high powered O. Did I mention that the linemen are also going to state in a lineman challenge. Could everyone be over looking them a little. YOUR THOUGHTS SS is going to have an excellent team this year. I think the SS and WH pre district game will tell us a great deal about how the respective district races will go. If people are taking SS lightly in their district they are in for a surprise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcatsshock Posted June 29, 2008 Author Share Posted June 29, 2008 s.s is over looked and will def. be one to watch out for next season. i think they will catch some big attention and also get a district champion ship Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNatureBoy16times Posted June 30, 2008 Share Posted June 30, 2008 Does the running back from Alba that came over play 7 on 7 for SS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ETFootball Posted June 30, 2008 Share Posted June 30, 2008 s.s is over looked and will def. be one to watch out for next season. i think they will catch some big attention and also get a district champion ship SS will be pretty good this year but I think that there might be a few other teams in their district that are pretty good too. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackflag79 Posted July 1, 2008 Share Posted July 1, 2008 Sulphur Springs was very good. I wouldn't be surprised to see them finish second in their district. Although 7 on 7 has nothing to do with 11 on 11, it still helps the QBs, receivers, and DBs. I still would have liked to see Gilmer at least compete in one of the state qualifiers. They didn't have all their players playing when they hosted their own tourney, and when they did get their players back, they went over to ETBU and won that 7 on 7 meet. Does anyone know why they didn't compete in any SQTs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now