osup116 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 So you are ageeing that Comey and other FBI agents should have been fired. All of AOC's and Maxine Watters, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Shummers aids should be let go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osup116 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 Good arguement anyway anyone answers =, unless they agree with tou. They are wrong. Unfoutunatly I dont care - This lady is a Kook Just like the one that was brought forth against Kavanaugh. The mud slingling is getting old. Lets Run this upcoming elections on accomplishments that can be backed up with facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osup116 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 Stunned Anderson Cooper Cuts CNN Interview After Trump Accuser Calls Rape "Sexy" Less than 48 hours after columnist (and soon to be book author) E. Jean Carroll accused (in a New York Magazine article) Donald Trump of raping her in a dressing room in high-end department store, Bergdorf Goodman, in the 1990's, CNN had gleefully invited the accuser on to discuss the details of this horrific act from her past. Things did not go according to plan for CNN... and we suspect for Ms. Carroll's book sales. While President Trump has vehemently denied the rape took place, a sensitive Anderson Cooper welcomed the woman on to his CNN show... then things went 'full awkward'. Cooper asked Carroll, "you don't feel like a victim?" after she suggested that was the case, and things went downhill fast. The seemingly unstable Carroll replied, "I was not flung to the floor." Cooper retorted, "I think most people think of rape as a violent assault..." To which Carrol replied, stunning the CNN anchor, "I think most people think of rape as being sexy..." Cooper stuttered, stumbled, and quickly cut the interview straight to a commercial break, but not before Carroll could add "...think of the fantasies." Perhaps next time, CNN will vet the mental health of their Trump-bashing guests a little better? Are we still supposed to believe every accuser or did Carroll just crush the credibility of the last two years of #MeToo-ism accusations in one 30-second breakdown? Tags Entertainment Culture 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Less than 48 hours after columnist (and soon to be book author) E. Jean Carroll accused (in a New York Magazine article) Donald Trump of raping her in a dressing room in high-end department store, Bergdorf Goodman, in the 1990's, CNN had gleefully invited the accuser on to discuss the details of this horrific act from her past. Things did not go according to plan for CNN... and we suspect for Ms. Carroll's book sales. While President Trump has vehemently denied the rape took place, a sensitive Anderson Cooper welcomed the woman on to his CNN show... then things went 'full awkward'. Cooper asked Carroll, "you don't feel like a victim?" after she suggested that was the case, and things went downhill fast. The seemingly unstable Carroll replied, "I was not flung to the floor." Cooper retorted, "I think most people think of rape as a violent assault..." To which Carrol replied, stunning the CNN anchor, "I think most people think of rape as being sexy..." Cooper stuttered, stumbled, and quickly cut the interview straight to a commercial break, but not before Carroll could add "...think of the fantasies." Perhaps next time, CNN will vet the mental health of their Trump-bashing guests a little better? Are we still supposed to believe every accuser or did Carroll just crush the credibility of the last two years of #MeToo-ism accusations in one 30-second breakdown? Tags Entertainment Culture
Wild74 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 12 minutes ago, GunnyHighway said: The Governments Ethics agency that is a watchdog on this kind of thing did not recommend that Any of those people be fired. Because , Here it comes , wait for it! They are Elected officials! Yes. isn't knowledge of the law your talking about helpful. Conway is not elected . There lies the difference. Osup116 said those folks aids not the individuals that was elected Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 Oh and Kelly Ann needs to say she is a good thrown in the dimwits side Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osup116 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 16 minutes ago, GunnyHighway said: Is the Access Hollywood tape where Trump Braggs about doing this kind of thing a fake? No i am saying she is a KOOK and Trump is not the only man to say something dumb, or do something done. Reference Bill Clinton and John F. Kennedy both used their power in Whitehouse to have an affair. Both are considered great presidents by nost Dems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 I have come accustom to the dimwits outrageous behavior except the dimwits never had someone who could throw it back at them like Trump and they don't like it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osup116 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 Thanks Wild Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 Just now, GunnyHighway said: The Government Watchdog group didn't call for those people to be fired or resign. they did on her. There lies the difference. just because you point at the neighbor for breaking the law while the police are arresting you it does not mean they broke the law too. does not work that way. I am sure they wouldn't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 50 minutes ago, GunnyHighway said: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trumps-latest-court-filing-is-an-invitation-to-begin-impeachment-proceedings/2019/06/12/339b08c8-8d29-11e9-8f69-a2795fca3343_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.a945eb200b1a Except there was no obstruction and this is just a bias opinion piece 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 1 minute ago, GunnyHighway said: The Government Watchdog group didn't call for those people to be fired or resign. they did on her. There lies the difference. just because you point at the neighbor for breaking the law while the police are arresting you it does not mean they broke the law too. does not work that way. Unless the neighbor actually did break the law. The morals and ethics of our entire Congress and various government agencies all needs to be examined. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osup116 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 Have you ever mumble about doing something when you were mad. Then just left it like that Yea - its that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ETXfan16 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, GunnyHighway said: There is constant Obstruction. its ongoing as we debate this. Volume Two of the Mueller Report lays out over Ten incidents of Obstruction. Him ordering Don McGan to fire Mueller alone is Obstruction. Volume II it full of examples of Obstruction. Mueller was limited by DOJ guidelines so he could not charge him because he is currently the president. Did you read the Mueller Report? I didn't think so You do realize he won't ever be impeached. You do understand that, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 Just now, ETXfan16 said: You do realize he won't ever be impeached. You do understand that, right? Funny Mueller couldn't find enough evidence to impeach but a bunch of knuckle heads in congress think that they have the evidence, it would be worth the waste of time to see them make a case and show their evidence that Mueller didn't seem to find 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ETXfan16 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 You need to speed up Gunny, this was a dem talking point in 2016 and it didn't work. Catch up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ETXfan16 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 Just now, Wild74 said: Funny Mueller couldn't find enough evidence to impeach but a bunch of knuckle heads in congress think that they have the evidence, it would be worth the waste of time to see them make a case and show their evidence that Mueller didn't seem to find Not only is there no evidence, but it wouldn't even make it through the senate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ETXfan16 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 3 minutes ago, GunnyHighway said: No. It was a Trump Talking point . that's not a Dem on tape bragging about doing this stuff to women. that's your president ETXfan16. This is a new allegation that takes us back to Trumps own words Yup, that is my president. He's also yours. LOL Trump talked about it, Bill DID it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ETXfan16 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 Wait , wait, wait... Let me guess your next left talking point that's also false. "Trump likes Neo Nazis!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ETXfan16 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 16 minutes ago, GunnyHighway said: 1 Mueller cant impeach. that's the house and the senate. 2 Mueller could not charge Trump because of DOJ guidelines . 3 Mueller found over 10 examples of Obstruction but again he could not charge. Senate will not impeach him for political reasons. Evidence is in Black and white in volume II of Mueller Report guys Okay. So you do understand he won't ever be impeached? Great. Glad we are on the same page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 19 minutes ago, GunnyHighway said: 1 Mueller cant impeach. that's the house and the senate. 2 Mueller could not charge Trump because of DOJ guidelines . 3 Mueller found over 10 examples of Obstruction but again he could not charge. Senate will not impeach him for political reasons. Evidence is in Black and white in volume II of Mueller Report guys Then why isn't Democratic House Leadership moving forward? Pelosi disagrees with you. The "why" behind them not pursuing impeachment can be debated, but the fact is that right now they aren't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 52 minutes ago, GunnyHighway said: Oh they will get there. its a step by step process. First Mueller must testify. McGan also has to. Hope hicks must answer All questions. Its clear that Trump wants this drawn out as long as he can. Courts will find that these people must testify. it will be public in full view of all americans. Trump cant stop it in the end. Then they will impeach. So why aren't they pursuing it right now? They already have the Mueller report, and Nadler has already gotten "underlying" evidence. There's not even a consensus among Democrats that impeachment should be pursued. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 1 hour ago, GunnyHighway said: 1 Mueller cant impeach. that's the house and the senate. 2 Mueller could not charge Trump because of DOJ guidelines . 3 Mueller found over 10 examples of Obstruction but again he could not charge. Senate will not impeach him for political reasons. Evidence is in Black and white in volume II of Mueller Report guys Mueller had to recant that lie shortly after his short little canned statement. He had to or be charged with lying to congress because he had already told the AG specifically that WAS NOT the reason he decided not to charge President Trump. Mueller has never provided any other explanation as to why he didn't charge him ... if Mueller ever testifies, he has a lot of explaining to do that he really doesn't want to reveal .... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ETXfan16 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 1 minute ago, GunnyHighway said: So Trump didn't have an affair with Stormy Daniels the Porn Star? He didn't have his Fixer who is now in prison pay her off to get her to be quiet? by the way, He was apparently having that relationshinp at the same time as he was seeing the Playmate when his wife was pregnant. or do you say that didn't happen? Do we know for sure? If it did, it still doesn't change the fact that he is YOUR president whether you like it or not. Do you seriously think you will change my mind? Lol give up already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ETXfan16 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 Just now, GunnyHighway said: Oh. Now Stormy is lying. Now that's funny. You know he did it! Come On man! how do you expect to have an honest debate on here when we know he paid her off for her silence! I don't think it will change your mind at all. I believe your perfectly content having a vile dirtbag in the white house . I just find it hilarious. because in this Video. Trump is talking about YOU. and laughing his tail off. even he is amazed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFqCJfUKlls Okay? Let's say he did it! ...... See? Nothing changed. Yes I would rather have Donald Trump in office than any scumbag the left has to offer. He's actually getting things done. And the more you try to change peoples minds the more people will support him. So thanks for falling in the trap buddy! I'll count you in as an honorary Trump/Pence 2020 supporter. Thank you for your donation! 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 1 hour ago, GunnyHighway said: They are pursuing it. its called subpoenas. Although Trump and the WH is trying to slow that down. SO the hold up is Trump. Let them have the hearing with the witnesses they request. But he wont do that because his people did read the report unlike you. Trump has his cult so brainwashed they actually don't want to actually read what Mueller wrote. you guys would rather stick your head in the sand and believe Trump. its actually hilarious. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFqCJfUKlls True, I haven't read the report. That's irrelevant to my point, though. Especially considering I didn't even vote for Trump. How come Pelosi has said specifically that she doesn't want to pursue impeachment? Democrats have the House. They could draft and vote on articles of impeachment. Why haven't they? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now